Ka-Pow! Thwap! Marvel faces ownership fight for Spider-Man and the Incredible Hulk

By Carol Eisenberg

July 8, 2008 at 9:03am

Marvel Comics’ transformation from a bankrupt company with a dusty library of 5,000 superheroes in 1998 into a booming entertainment conglomerate that produced its first self-made movies this year was a real-life metamorphosis.

After last month’s release of “The Incredible Hulk,” a gushing story in Portfolio asked, “Is Marvel the next Magic Kingdom?”

The Wall Street Journal trumpeted the $500-million-plus receipts from “The Iron Man,” starring Robert Downey Jr. as the first sign of “the company’s transition from a licenser of its comic-book superheroes to an independent film studio that can build its characters into full-fledged franchises.”

Adding to the buzz was news of the first-ever Marvel Theme Park slated to open in 2011, a $1-billion project undertaken in Dubai in partnership with the Al Ahli Group, a developer in the United Arab Emirates.

“Creating their own studio is the best idea Marvel has had since the creation of Spider-Man,” Jeff Bock of Exhibitor Relations, which tracks box office receipts, told Portfolio. “They have thousands of characters that fans would love to see on the big screen.”

But just when everything seemed golden came a plot complication that seemed ripped from one of Marvel’s own comics.

A three-time felon named Peter F. Paul, a former partner of Marvel creator Stan Lee, helped bring a lawsuit against the company, and a complaint with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, contending that a now-bankrupt company named Stan Lee Media, which Lee had co-owned with Paul, had co-ownership of Marvel characters like Spider-Man and the Incredible Hulk.

Barron’s wrote about the 2007 lawsuit and complaint last week, predicting that a bitter legal fight could undermine investor confidence in the company regardless of its outcome. The price of Marvel stock began falling that very day - despite Marvel’s insistence that the claims were baseless.

The story may have hit some Marvel investors hard since the company had made a spectacular comeback after years of poor performance and, then, bankruptcy, under financier Ronald Perelman. In 1998, the new controlling shareholder, Isaac Perlmutter, used bankruptcy procedures to end Marvel’s $1 million-a-year lifetime contract with Lee, who had spent more than 60 years at the company and who had helped create The Incredible Hulk, the X-Men and Spider-Man, among other characters.

The abrogation of that contract was what freed Lee, in October, 1998, to start a new company, an Internet animation studio called Stan Lee Media, along with his then-friend Peter Paul. Paul put $500,000 into the new company, while Lee assigned it all his intellectual property rights. The new dot-com rode the bubble market for a while, then went bankrupt in 2001.

The lawsuit and the SEC complaint, filed by self-described whistleblower James L. Nesfield (once a star witness for former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer) on behalf of the shareholders of Stan Lee Media, alleges that Marvel had agreed to sign over Lee’s ownership rights of his superhero characters to Stan Lee Media, but in fact, never did so.

But Marvel spokesman Richard Land denied such an agreement and insisted Lee had no ownership rights.

In written agreements, “Mr. Lee acknowledged and confirmed that all the work he did for Marvel from the beginning of his employment (in 1940) was as an employee,” Land said.

“. . .Since he never owned them, he could never have transferred them to anybody. Mr. Lee himself has always acknowledged that the Marvel characters belong and always belonged to Marvel.”

Lee, now 85, has written shareholders of Stan Lee Media that Paul is behind the lawsuit and SEC filing, and blamed him for the bankruptcy of Stan Lee Media. He has also made statements concurring with Marvel’s ”work for hire” characterization of his work.

The complaint was brought after Paul was extradited back to this country from Brazil, and he now awaits sentencing on his most-recent felony conviction for the manipulation of Stan Lee Media’s stock. He has two prior felony convictions, one for attempting to sell Cuba $8.75 million worth of coffee that never existed, and a second for cocaine possession.

“His history speaks for itself,” Land said of Paul.

Not everyone is convinced the suit lacks merit, however.

In his story for Barron’s, Alpert contends that documents attached to Marvel’s filings with the SEC “show contradictory assignments by Stan Lee of his rights to all these characters.”

Alpert notes that in 2002, after Stan Lee Media went bankrupt, Lee sued Marvel Entertainment on a previously undisclosed contract.

“It turned out that in November 1998 . . .Lee had gone to Marvel claiming half-ownership of Spider-Man, the X-Men and other characters, since Marvel had cancelled his previous rights assignment in its bankruptcy,” according to Alpert. That claim was made a month after he had signed over his intellectual property rights to Stan Lee Media.

“Lee got a new contract for up to $1 million in annual salary and 10% of movie and TV profits, assigning Marvel his rights in those characters,” Alpert wrote. “So, come 2002, Spider-Man: The Movie had grossed more than $1 billion and Lee invoked that contract and sued. Their 2005 settlement was sealed, but Marvel later reported a $10 million charge for it.”

At the very least, the case will surely bring forth a crop of superhero lawyers.

Follow Muckety on Twitter Tweet This! Share on Facebook

Click here to sign up for the Muckety Newsletter

 Read related stories: Business  


  • #1.   gettothetruth 07.08.2008

    As a stockholder of SLM, I am more than perturbed with Mr. Lee. In looking through BK documents, I discovered that he looted the company. Instead of doing what he agreed to do when he signed an agreement during BK as president of SLC LLC (a company he never formed), he removed properties from the BK without court knowledge or approval. He had the debtor in possession, Junko Kobayashi, an officer of his new company, POW Entertainment, sign over assets to a subsidiary, QED, through another insider, Gill Champion, also an officer of POW Entertainment. That is called bankruptcy fraud, and so far Mr. Lee has gotten away with the crime. He made a deal using the looted assets with Vidiator a few months before the BK was dismissed for cause in late 2006. The money from that deal belongs to the shareholders. Turn it over, Stan. Hey, FBI and SEC, what are you going to do about this? Judge Lax, he is mocking your court. He made a fool out of all of you. Even Spiderman should not be allowed to be above the law.

    In his lawsuit against Marvel, Stan absolutely asserted ownership rights. That is why he got over $10 million (money that belongs to SLM shareholders) and a share of profits (also money that belongs to SLM shareholders). Stan is the major shareholder in SLM. He would get his fair share. Stan, you are not going to get away with keeping our share of the money. A real superhero would not do that. Lowlife scumbags do that.

  • #2.   Laura 07.08.2008


  • #3.   gettothetruth 07.09.2008

    Lee fought the SLM suit and publicly condemned. He publicly claimed he has no rights to the characters. Gee, could that be because Stan got his. He got $14 million from Marvel plus share of profits. What does he care about the SLM investors? When he says today that the famous characters were always a work for hire, recall what he said when he sued Marvel:

    14. Under the Agreement the Defendants were given the right and assumed the obligation to commercially exploit Mr. Lee’s characters, as well as his name. In order to facilitate these rights and obligations, Defendants received a conditional assignment of Mr. Lee’s rights in his many world famous and hugely popular characters, and Mr. Lee was entitled to share in the profits from any live action or animation television or movie production based on these characters and other Marvel characters, as well as profits from the exploitation of any ancillary rights associated with such film or television productions, including toys.

    15. Throughout his relationship of more than sixty years with Defendants, during which Mr. Lee permitted Defendants to exploit his superhero characters on the understanding that they would share in the profits derived therefrom, Mr. Lee reposed trust and confidence in Defendants to, among other things, deal with him fairly and in good faith, and to pay over to him a portion of the profits derived from such commercial exploitation.

    As you see, the “Defendants were given the right and assumed the obligation to commercially exploit Mr. Lee’s characters.” Defendants received a “conditional assignment of Mr. Lee’s rights.”
    Mr. Lee “permitted Defendants to exploit his superhero characters.”

    Isn’t that interesting? He asserted then what he denies now after getting paid off by Marvel. How convenient for him in screwing the investors of SLM.

  • #4.   gettothetruth 07.14.2008

    This YouTube tells the story =

Leave a Comment

The relationship map to the left is interactive.
• Solid lines are current relations. Dotted lines are former relations.
• Expand items with + signs by double-clicking or by selecting multiple items in the map and pressing the "e" key.
• Move an item in the map by clicking and dragging.
• You can also delete items, separate boxes and save maps. Right-click on the map or select Map Tools for these options.
• Find out more about an item in the map by right-clicking on the item and choosing Information about...
• View map color key.
• This interactive map requires Flash player.

Become a fan of Muckety on Facebook

  • Search for stories
    Special Features

Follow Muckety on Twitter Follow Muckety on Twitter
Muckety has no direct connection to most of the people or organizations listed on these pages.
We are unable to forward personal messages or provide personal contact information.
We make every effort at Muckety to ensure that our data is correct and timely. However, relationships are in constant flux and we cannot guarantee accuracy. If you come across incorrect or outdated information, please let us know by email.
© 2017 Muckety LLC